Blog Archive

Monday, June 30, 2014

The gender inequality in the Philippines

Posted by Belarmino Dabalos Saguing                                                                                                                                                       Rome, Italy 30 /o6/2014



The Philippines has made some progress in promoting gender equality in the last decade. The Government’s Framework Plan for Women emphasises women’s economic empowerment, women’s human rights and gender- responsive governance as the keys to gender equality and the empowerment of women. Despite these commitments, obstacles to substantive gender equality remain. Although the Philippines has achieved gender parity in primary, secondary and tertiary education, this has not translated to equality in economic opportunity or political participation.
Women in rural areas are particularly marginalised. The United Nations Committee on Discrimination Against Women has noted the persistence of deep-rooted stereotypes about the roles and responsibilities of women and men as an impediment to women’s equal participation in economic and political life. Women are over-represented in the informal economy which bears negative consequences for their access to basic services such as social security and health care. Further, in recent decades there has been a significant growth in the number of women migrating overseas to work as domestic workers or nurses, where they are vulnerable to becoming victims of exploitation, violence and trafficking.
The Philippines has a disceiminatory Family Code. The 1997 Family Code sets the legal age of marriage at 18 years for both men and women.  However, the Muslim Personal Laws permit marriage of girls under the age of 18 as well as allowing arranged marriages.  The United Nations reports, based on 2003 data that 9% of girls between 15 and 19 years of age were married, divorced or widowed, compared to 2% of boys in the same age range. In 1980, 14% of girls aged between 15 and 19 were married, divorced or widowed which indicates that societal acceptance of early marriage has declined slowly in recent decades.  The mean age of marriage for women is 23.  In 2006, the United Nations Committee on Discrimination Against Women expressed concern about the persistent practice of early marriage amongst Muslim women  With respect to other discriminatory practices against women in marriage, the Mindanao Commission on Women reports that bride abduction, forced marriage and payment of bride price still persist as part of the culturally sanctioned practices in the island of Mindanao. Polygamy is illegal for men under the Penal Code in the form of concubinage  However, the Muslim Personal Laws permit polygamy. Article 27 allows a man to have more than one wife "if he can deal with them with equal companionship and just treatment as enjoined by Islamic law and only in exceptional cases", but a woman may not have more than one husband.
 The 1997 Family Code granted men and women equal parental authority and shared responsibility for raising their children.  The law also permits women to retain parental authority over her children after remarriage.  In 2006, the United Nations Committee on Discrimination Against Women expressed concern about the lack of a law on divorce which makes it impossible for women to obtain a legal divorce,  The Family Code does however provide for legal separation on the grounds of repeated violence, psychological incapacity, homosexuality and lesbianism and drug addiction.  Legal separation provides for separate living arrangements and terminated the marital rights of husband and wife, but the couple remained married in name.
Women also experience discrimination in the Philippines under the laws relating to adultery. The Revised Penal Code defines sexual infidelity differently for men and women. A wife can be made criminally liable for mere adultery, while a husband will need to have committed concubinage. The crime of adultery carries stiffer penalties compared with concubinage
There is no legal discrimination between men and women in the area of inheritance. Inheritance follows both the male and the female line, succession norms adopt either the primogeniture system (whereby land is inherited by the eldest male or female child) or the equal sharing system (whereby all male and female heirs inherit equally). The surviving spouse, male or female, may not inherit, but holds land as a trustee for the children.  However, in 2004 the government reported that there is some evidence that propertied parents leave lands to sons but ensure the future of daughters by investing in their education.
The Philippines has experienced a rise in the number of female-headed households in recent decades. The government’s response to this shift may indicate a change in attitudes towards women’s role in the family. For example, in 2000 the government passed the Solo Parents Welfare Act of 2000 which provides for a comprehensive program of social development and welfare services for sole parents and their children including flexible work arrangements and parental leave of seven working days, livelihood development services, educational and housing benefits, among others.

Violence against women in the Philippines it is reported to be a serious problem.  Non-government organisations report that domestic violence is the most common form of gender-based violence in the Philippines country, followed by rape. A 2008 Demographic Health Survey found that about three in ten women report having experienced spousal violence (physical, sexual or other) at some time in their life. One in seven ever-married women report having experienced physical violence by their husbands, and 8% report that having experienced sexual violence by their husbands. The survey found that 9% of women age 15-49 have ever experienced sexual violence.


Source: WkiGender








Friday, June 27, 2014

Press Statement | Rights Lawyers Slam DOJ Resolution Absolving Military and Police Officers in Security Guard’s Torture, Detention

Press Statement
27 June 2014




Rights Lawyers Slam DOJ Resolution Absolving Military and Police Officers in Security Guard’s Torture, Detention
 
Lawyers from the National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers (NUPL) filed a Petition for Partial Review yesterday seeking a partial review and reversal of a DOJ Resolution absolving Major Generals Alan Luga and Eduardo Del Rosario, Police Chief Superintendent James Andres Melad, Senior Superintendent Manuel Abu and Chief Inspector Reynaldo Mendoza from charges of violating the Anti-Torture Law.  The NUPL is counsel for security guard Rolly Mira Panesa who was tortured and detained for almost a year after having been falsely accused of being a ranking communist rebel.
 
The DOJ also cleared Atty. Alex Popanes, a lawyer from the Judge Advocate General Office of incriminatory machination, Col. Generoso Bolina and military witnesses for perjury.
 
In the 26-page Petition for Partial Review, the NUPL questioned the DOJ finding that Panesa was not subjected to torture since his injuries were “merely superficial much less not severe.”  Panesa’s lawyers argued that RA 9745 or the Anti-Torture Law does not preclude its application even if the injury is not serious “as long as extreme pain is inflicted through any of the means enumerated in its provisions.”
 
The NUPL further argued that the military and police officers were included in the complaint on the basis of the principle of command responsibility, citing Section 13 of the Anti-Torture Law which holds superior military, police or law enforcement officer or senior government official who issued an order to commit torture or immediate commanding officer of the AFP unit concerned or the immediate senior public official of the PNP and other law enforcement agencies criminally liable for acts of torture.
 
The NUPL in a statement said that to uphold the findings of the DOJ prosecutor would be a dangerous precedent and would negate the intention and purpose for which the anti-torture law was enacted. ###


REFERENCE: ATTY. EDRE U. OLALIA- Secretary-General- +639175113373

Atty. Edre U.Olalia (downloaded photo)

National Secretariat
National Union of Peoples' Lawyers (NUPL)
3F Erythrina Bldg., Maaralin corner Matatag Sts. Central District,Quezon City, Philippines
Telefax no.920-6660
Email addresses: nupl2007@gmail.com and nuplphilippines@yahoo.com
Follow us on twitter @nuplphilippines and facebook @https://www.facebook.com/nuplphilippines
Visit the NUPL website at http://www.nupl.net/


"By calling yourselves the ‘people’s lawyer,’ you have made a remarkable choice. You decided not to remain in the sidelines. Where human rights are assaulted, you have chosen to sacrifice the comfort of the fence for the dangers of the battlefield. But only those who choose to fight on the battlefield live beyond irrelevance.”
- Supreme Court Chief Justice Reynato S. Puno, in his message at the NUPL Founding Congress, September 15, 2007

"After long years of experience as a people’s lawyer, I can honestly say it has been a treasured journey of self-fulfillment and rewarding achievement. I know it will be the same for all others who choose to tread this path."  
- Atty. Romeo T. Capulong, NUPL founding chairperson, in his keynote address at the Fifth Conference of Lawyers in Asia Pacific  
 ( COLAP V), September 18, 2010



AMBALA | Crops destroyed by police, agrarian reform officials to make way for Cojuangco sugarcane aryendo in Hacienda Luisita

Crops destroyed by police, agrarian reform officials to make way for Cojuangco sugarcane aryendo in Hacienda Luisita

Reference: Edith David, AMBALA Barangay Mapalacsiao




FACT SHEET:  INCIDENTS IN BARANGAY MAPALACSIAO, HACIENDA LUISITA

I.          VIOLATION:  Destruction of Crops

II.         DATE OF INCIDENT:  JUNE 25, 2014

III.            VICTIMS

1.    Alyansa ng mga Manggagawang-Bukid sa Asyenda Luisita (AMBALA)-Barangay Mapalacsiao Chapter 
2.     Charlito “Tatang Gerry” Catalan, 68 years old and family

IV.           ALLEGED PERPETRATORS

1.    Department of Agrarian Reform (DAR) Provincial Agrarian Reform Officers (PARO) identified as Atty. Narciso, Beth Ocampo & Oca Atillo.
2.   A certain Sheriff Alfredo de Mesa
3.   Around 12 uniformed & fully-armed elements of theTarlac Philippine National Police (PNP)
4.   Barangay Lourdes (Texas) Barangay Captain Edison Diaz and barangay watchmen (tanod)
  
Around 7:00 a.m. of Wednesday, June 25, 2014,  persons aboard vehicles with plate numbers SHS 947 (Patrol) and PTA 748 (Gray Mitsubishi) arrived at the local headquarters or “kubol” (hut) of the Alyansa ng mga Manggagawang-Bukid sa Asyenda Luisita (AMBALA) in Silangan Street, Barangay Mapalacsiao, Hacienda Luisita. 
Among them were local DAR officials led by an Atty. Narciso with Beth Ocampo and Oca Atillo; a Sheriff Alfredo de Mesa; the village chief (barangay captain) of another Luisita barangay, Lourdes (more popularly known as “Texas”), Edison Diaz, his village watchmen (tanod) and some locals; and around 12 fully-armed elements of the Tarlac City police. These officials demanded that AMBALA abandon the area because the lots were already allocated to other farmworker-beneficiaries (FWBs), particularly residents of another barangay, Lourdes, via the DAR’s tambiolo(lottery drum) raffle draws last year.
AMBALA members negotiated and asked the officials to honor a previous agreement forged last May 16 between AMBALA and local barangay officials in Hacienda Luisita, Diaz included, to settle disputes among residents and FWBs peacefully, particularly taking into consideration the rights of farmers with existing crops and those who have spent years of toil to develop farmlots for food production. Local AMBALA members asked the DAR officials not to destroy crops. 
The local AMBALA headquarters in Mapalacsiao is adjacent to several hectares of rice and vegetable pilot farms employing collective and organic farming practices. With years of training from organic farming experts and practical applications since theirbungkalan or land cultivation program commenced in 2005, local AMBALA members in Mapalacsiao have already set up successful models such as a local nursery for vegetables and fruit trees and regular production of compost and other organic fertilizers servicing farmers not only in Mapalacsiao but all other Luisita villages where hundreds of AMBALA members actively engage in the bungkalan. 
The farmworkers also showed the DAR officials some documents prohibiting the destruction of crops. But after an hour of discussion, at around 8:00 am, a red big tractor owned by the DAR, manned by Brgy. Capt. Diaz himself, proceeded to destroy AMBALA’s crops. Fully-armed police stood by to serve as security while the group destroyed the crops.   
Among those destroyed were:
-          Around half a hectare of sweet potato (camote) scheduled for harvest on July 15
-          Two fields of string beans (sitaw) with trellises
-          Three fields of cassava (kamoteng kahoy)
-          Three fields of eggplant (talong) with abundant fruits
The group threatened to return on Sunday, June 29, to destroy the rest of AMBALA’s crops. 
By 11:00 am, the group proceeded to the nearby farmlot of Charlito “Tatang Gerry” Catalan, a 68-year old farmer and long-time Hacienda Luisita farmworker and resident. 
The group told Tatang Gerry the same argument demanding him to abandon the area because the lots have already been raffled out to other FWBs. But Tatang Gerry and his family have already invested years of toil into the farm, which now has diverse crops and its own fish pond. 
The discussion ended with both parties agreeing that crops must not be destroyed. But only a few moments after Tatang Gerry turned his back, the group began destroying all of the crops now using two big tractors, the red one and another colored blue,  both owned by the DAR. The police once again served as the group’s security detail.
Among those destroyed were:
-          12 cavans (around 600 kilos) of palay seeds scheduled for planting in July
-          Fertilizers and herbicides
-          Around half a hectare of squash (kalabasa) with abundant fruits, edible tops and flowers
-          25 beds of mushrooms (active)
-          Three fields of string beans (sitaw) with trellises
-          Three fields of sweet potato (camote) earning a minimum of Php 500 a day from camote tops
AMBALA condemned the attacks in a statement saying that the “The DAR is only posturing that it wants to install legitimate beneficiaries, but it only seeks to evict farmers engaged in palay and vegetable production to make way for the Cojuangcos’ sugarcane aryendo.”
Under the aryendo or lease system, Cojuangco financier agents offer a measly Php 7,000 a year lease to cash-strapped FWBs using documents from the DAR such as the Lot Allocation Certificate (LAC) and Certificate of Land Ownership Award (CLOA) as a sort of collateral. Lots are reconcentrated back to Cojuangco-Aquino control to sustain the sugarcane needs of the Central  Azucarera de Tarlac sugar mill, even before actual physical land distribution can occur. 
“The DAR only seeks to discredit the hard toil of farmworkers engaged in bungkalan, and ultimately protect the Cojuangco-Aquinos and their exploitative aryendo system,” according to AMBALA Chairperson Florida Sibayan. 
Local barangay officials broker these agreements between Cojuangco dummies and FWBs and receive cuts. This explains the role of the likes of Barangay Captains Edison Diaz of Lourdes and Rael Gatus of Mapalacsiao, who have been actively involved in recent disputes – not to mediate but to aggressively impose the chaotic and divisive DAR scheme. Like DAR officials, they also posture to speak in behalf of “disgruntled FWBs,” but their actions actually favor interests of the sugarcane planters and the Cojuangco-Aquino family. 
In Barangay Mapalacsiao alone, ex-LTO Chief Virginia Torres, a known ally and “Kabarilan” (shooting buddy) of President BS Aquino, has covered around 200 hectares for sugarcane, victimizing hundreds of FWBs through the aryendo system. Arsenio Valentino – former Hacienda Luisita, Inc. (HLI) supervisor-turned- Agrarian Reform Beneficiaries Organization head – meanwhile, has control of hundreds of hectares of DAR-allocated lots in Barangays Lourdes, Bantog and Asturias. 
The attacks in Barangay Mapalacsiao is the latest in a series of systematic assaults against organized farmworkers (AMBALA) and their bungkalan,  since the DAR commenced what farmers call “sham land distribution” in Hacienda Luisita. AMBALA believes that the group took the opportunity to destroy crops in Mapalacsiao while most AMBALA members and leaders are involved in the Luzon-wide Peasant Lakbayan (People’s March) which will culminate on June 30, the expiration of the widely-criticized Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP) of the government.
Since November 2013, bungkalan pilot farms and farmers’ crops were bulldozed by the Cojuangco-owned Tarlac Development Corporation (TADECO) in Barangay Balete after the DAR excluded 358 hectares for land distribution and belatedly issued a notice of land coverage on the same day of TADECO’s violent eviction of farmers. In Barangay Cutcut, around 100 hectares (out of the total 358 hectares claimed by TADECO) of ricefields and vegetable plantations were fenced by TADECO after violent assaults and failed murder attempts against AMBALA leaders in March. State forces such as the Tarlac PNP and military elements were employed to ensure the eviction of farmers. Trumped-up charges serving as “harassment suits” were filed against hundreds of farmers, AMBALA leaders and supporters. 

Tatang Gerry Catalan himself is a direct victim of harassment by the DAR. He was previously arrested by fully-armed police elements along with 4 other farmers in April, based on a flimsy complaint by DAR-hired personnel who accused the farmers of impeding her work. After the unlawful arrest, the DAR National Office issued press statements threatening imprisonment to anyone opposed to DAR’s land distribution scheme in Hacienda Luisita. Catalan and four other Mapalacsiao farmers are currently facing charges of violation of R.A. 6657 (CARP).

Wednesday, June 25, 2014

DAR employing police, Cojuangco dummies to protect illicit aryendo system in Hacienda Luisita

Source Verification: 
Gi Estrada
UMA Media Officer



Tension in Hacienda Luisita continues to rise with the Department of Agrarian Reform (DAR)’s active use of Cojuangco representatives and local police to impose what farmers call “sham land distribution” in the controversial sugar estate.
 
For several weeks now, personnel from the DAR’s Tarlac Provincial Agrarian Reform Office (PARO) and known Cojuangco dummies such as former HLI supervisor-turned- Agrarian Reform Beneficiaries Organization head Arsenio Valentino -- have been warning farmers to vacate parcels of agricultural land devoted to the bungkalan or land cultivation program, initiated by farm workers since 2005.
 
During the bungkalan’s peak, around 2,000 hectares out of the 6,453-hectare sugarcane plantation were transformed into ricefields and food crop plots.
 
The DAR, however, callously undermined the farmworkers’ bungkalanthrough its dubious land survey, the tambiolo raffle draw lot allocation process and the belated issuance of land reform coverage notices for hundreds of hectares of agricultural land in Hacienda Luisita -- resulting to the disenfranchisement and dislocation of hundreds of farmers who have positioned themselves in bungkalan areas particularly in barangays Balete, Cutcut, Mapalacsiao, Bantog and Asturias.
 
“The DAR is deliberately sowing confusion and dispute among the ranks of Luisita farmers and residents via sham land distribution. Bahagi ito ng patuloy na panloloko, pandarahas at pangangamkam ng pamilya Cojuangco-Aquino sa Hacienda Luisita,” said Florida Sibayan, chairperson of the Alyansa ng mga Manggagawang Bukid sa Asyenda Luisita (AMBALA).
 
Today, DAR personnel, escorted by around 12 elements of the Tarlac City police, threatened Mapalacsiao farmers with eviction to supposedly install legitimate farmworker-beneficiaries (FWBs) from another barangay, Lourdes, awarded lots by the DAR in the same areas devoted to the bungkalan in Barangay Mapalacsiao. The lots in question, however are already covered by the exploitative aryendo or lease system brokered by Cojuangco financier-agents. Under the aryendo, FWBs are paid a measly 7,000 a year for the lease of the 6,600 sq. meter lot awarded by the DAR.

“The DAR is only posturing that it wants to install legitimate beneficiaries, but it only seeks to evict farmers engaged in palay and vegetable production to make way for the Cojuangcos’ sugarcane aryendo,” said Sibayan. Through the aryendo, farmlots are reconcentrated back to Cojuangco-Aquino control even before actual physical land distribution can occur.
 
In Barangay Mapalacsiao alone, ex-LTO Chief Virginia Torres, a known ally and “Kabarilan” of President BS Aquino, has covered around 200 hectares for sugarcane, victimizing hundreds of FWBs through the aryendo system. Arsenio Valentino, meanwhile, has control of hundreds of hectares of DAR-allocated lots in Barangays Bantog and Asturias.

“The DAR only seeks to discredit the hard toil of farmworkers engaged inbungkalan, and ultimately protect the illicit aryendo system,” said Sibayan.
 
Since yesterday, AMBALA has joined thousands of victims of the bogus Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP) in Central Luzon as they troop to Manila for a week-long peasant Lakbayan.


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Unyon ng mga Manggagawa sa Agrikultura
(Agricultural Workers Union)
Philippines


News release| SELDA calls for congressional probe on inhuman jail conditions

News Release
25 June 2014

Reference: Roneo Clamor, SELDA national coordinator, +63917-5965859



Samahan ng mga Ex-Detainees Laban sa Detensyon at Aresto (SELDA) called on lawmakers to investigate the inhuman prison conditions which most inmates, political prisoners and common criminals alike, are subjected to.
 
Amidst the VIP treatment of detained senators Revilla and Estrada who face plunder charges, SELDA challenged the BS Aquino government to comply with the Minimum Standards of Treatment of Prisoners.  SELDA is outraged with the double standard the BS Aquino government giving to plunderers while common criminals and political prisoners are suffering from inhuman conditions.
 
“We hear Sen. Revilla complaining about his hot detention cell, with rats and cockroaches. But actually, regular detention cells are far worse than his,” Roneo Clamor, SELDA national coordinator said. “A 3x5-meter cell meant for two inmates is cramped with six to 10 detainees in regular jails. Even the lavatories are used as sleeping quarters,” Clamor described. “Prisoners usually have limited supply of water, suffer from poor ventilation, and receive no proper medical attention,” Clamor continued.
 
Clamor cited the condition of Benny Barid, a political prisoner who has been in and out of the New Bilibid Prisons hospital because of his illnesses. “He is all skinny, as in buto’t balat (skin and bones)because of his chronic asthma. His skin is full of allergies. Instead of releasing him on humanitarian grounds, he remains in the NBP hospital without proper medical attention. He becomes susceptible to more infectious diseases inside the hospital and in their cramped cells,” said Clamor.
 
“Despite the many exposé and complaints on the conditions of jails in the country the BS Aquino government has not done anything to improve the situation. But it has ensured the comfort of plunderers like Janet Lim-Napoles and senators Revilla and Estrada in their own rooms while supposedly in prison,” Clamor said.
 
In a message dated June 8, Eduardo Sarmiento, detained peace consultant for the National Democratic Front of the Philippines (NDFP), shared the plight of the 489 political prisoners detained in different detention centers in the country. “Political prisoners, like common criminals, suffer arbitrary and discriminatory regulations such as curtailment of visiting rights… harassed by corrupt prison guards, who punish them and put them in isolation for no reason,” said Sarmiento.
 
“Worst, the political prisoners are made to face several trumped up criminal charges for practicing their political beliefs which is a right of every person,” Clamor added.
 
Lastly, SELDA called to release all political prisoners especially those who are ailing and elderly based on humanitarian grounds. “The plunderers should take their place in jail.” ###

-- 
The Samahan ng Ex-Detainees Laban sa Detensyon at Aresto (SELDA) is an organization of former political prisoners in the Philippines. Founded on December 4, 1984, SELDA was initiated by newly-released political prisoners of the martial law period.  SELDA’s primary task is to work for the release of all political prisoners and to see to it that humane treatment of those who are still in detention are complied with by the Philippine authorities.  SELDA advocates justice for current and former political prisoners.  It calls for the mobilisation of resources in support of political prisoners, former detainees and their families.  It carries out legislative advocacy for the indemnification and rehabilitation of political prisoners. SELDA goes into partnership and builds solidarity with concerned individuals and groups for the freedom and welfare of political prisoners and all victims of tyranny.


Monday, June 23, 2014

Ang VIP ( very important Prisoner)

Posted by Belarmino Dabalos Saguing
Rome, Italy 23 June 2014




Ang isang senador na napatanyag dahil sa pangungurakot ng salapi ng bayan na dati nang pumasok sa piitan dahil sa pangungurakot sa hueteng at ngayon ay muling pumasok sa kulungan dahil naman sa pork ay sadyan nakakamuhi sa kanyang inaasal.

Kahit na toto ona siya ay kusang sumuko bago pa man nalagdaan ang kautusan sa pagdakip sa kanya ay talaga naman lumalabis na. Hindi pa sapat na ang kanyang selda ay may sukat na 32 metro kwadrado, may higaang maginhawa at bentelador ay humuhiling pan ng aircon at gusto pa niya ang isang telebisyong may “sky”, may giant screen upang mapanood niya ang kanyang paboritong telenobela samantaslang ang karaniwang mamamayan ay wala nito at di tulad niya ay halos wala nang makain.

Talagang baliktad na ang mundo. Kung ang nasa poser ang magnakaw, tinatawag itong business kahit pa ito ay monkey business at sila ay ikukulong sa espesyal at maginhawang selda. Samantalang kung isang mahirap ang magnakaw upang makakain lang, ito ay isang krimen at ang kriminal ay ilalagay sa kulungan na tututulan kahit ng ng mga hayop, at tiyak na mabubugbog pa.


Sa sip ng salaring ito ay tila utang na loob pa ng mga tao na siya ay ay isang big time na magnanakaw at dapat silang bigyan ng tratasyong bigtime. Ang dapat ay matikman nila ang tunay ng parusa sa isang salarin. 

Ang piitan ay dapat na pook na magtuturo samagnanakaw kung alin ang kanya at alin ang di kanya, isang koreksyonal na magtutuwid sa kamalian ng isang salarin. Hindi dapat ng maging isang lugal ng maluhong hotel ng bakasyon ang piitan kahit pa sa mga senador.

Higit sa lahat, ang preokupasyon sa selda ay umaagaw sa pokus sa isang higit na mahalagang isyu: ang pagnanakaw ng mga mababatas sa kabang bayan.




Monday, June 16, 2014

Aquino’s certification of CARP extension is highly hypocritical Especially as Disputed Lands in Hacienda Luisita has Been Approved by PEZA

From: International Coalition for Human Rights in the Philippines <icchrp@gmail.com>
To: philconcerns@humanrightsphilippines.net
Cc: 
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 07:00:23 +0200
Subject: [PhilConcerns] Fwd: Aquino’s certification of CARP extension is highly hypocritical Especially as Disputed Lands in Hacienda Luisita has Been Approved by PEZA
Apologies for any cross-posting. Thank you for understanding.


Aquino’s certification of CARP extension is highly hypocritical
Especially as Disputed Lands in Hacienda Luisita has Been Approved by PEZA  


President Aquino’s certification as urgent the bill extending the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP) for another two years is hypocritical as exemplified by another development in his kin’s Hacienda Luisita. 

 
On February 13, 2014 the board of the Philippine Export Zone Authority (PEZA) approved the application of the Cojuangco-Aquino-owned Luisita Realty Corporation (LRC) to proclaim some 258 hectares of Hacienda Luisita lands as a Special Economic Zone. By all indication, the President is likely to finalize the proclamation as soon as LRC furnishes PEZA with the required documents, such as the endorsement of the Tarlac City Council, a DAR Conversion Clearance Certificate, and a Proof of Land Ownership.

 
But the supposed subject lands are are the very same properties belonging to another Cojuangco-Aquino company, Tarlac Development  Corporation (TADECO) which had already been issued by the Department of Agrarian Reform (DAR) with a Notice of Coverage (NOC) in December 17, 2013.

 
Given the right pressure and substantial bribes, it would be easy for LRC or TADECO to get the required documents especially from the DAR, which implemented the bogus land reform in the Hacienda. Recently the DAR had even rejected the Alyansa ng mga Manggagawang Bukid’s (AMBALA) petition for a Cease and Desist Order (CDO) against TADECO which had fenced off the said lands after evicting hundreds of farmers in the area via bulldozer and arson.

 
DAR even acknowledged that it can act favorably on the protest made by the Cojuangco Company on the NOC order or even issue out a Conversion Order. This would pave the way for PEZA to endorse the said project to the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) Secretary for subsequent endorsement to the President for the issuance of the proclamation.

 
Clearly, the President would issue out the proclamation during his remaining term in office. This would further make a mockery of the bogus CARP which the President wants extended and is hypocritical to say the least.

 
The proponents of another couple of years of CARP extension are arguing that the DAR should be given more time to issue NOCs. The experiences of Hacienda Luisita farmers and those from other parts of the vast Philippine countryside have proven that NOCs and other DAR practices under CARP are mere token processes that do not at all fulfill the requirements of genuine land reform.

 
In rejecting AMBALA’s petition for a CDO against TADECO, DAR categorically stated that “the issuance of an NOC does not contemplate the actual taking of property for purposes of the land acquisition and distribution under the CARP. Rather the issuance of an NOC only commences the process of acquisition of private agricultural lands under the CARP which must always be subject to corresponding statutory rights, if any of the affected landowners, i.e. right to protest coverage, right to exercise retention, or to receive just compensation, among others.”

Wednesday, June 11, 2014

The true symbol of the nation

Posted by Makabayang Supremo
Rome, Italy, 11/06/2014



I am not physically present in my country and could only follow  the preparations for the upcoming 116th!independence Day celebrations through the pictures posted in internet, and what do we see? Numertous flags along the streets, public buildings above the people going on their daily cjores, their jobs, most are in the uniform of lowly workers: rags. These make me wonder,are flags the true symbol of the nation, or the people, the ordinary everyday people who are struggling to eke a living in a country immersed  neck-deep in povety?Are we celebrating the wrong independence day? Can we call ourselves free when the people are living a life not even fit for animals? Where is the prosperity of the nation being heralded I the papers when the people are not toiuched by the so-called economic progress? Is it because it was not the nation that is prospering but only the state run by the lucky ones who share the wealth, not by the nation who bear the hard luck of being poor?

All these questions boils down to only one question. Is the nation truly from thedomination by the overlords of wealth against whom our forefathers fought and died?

And is the nation as free as the flag above them seemingly free to fly in the breeze but, in reality, restrained by the cords that tied it to the pole?

If we have to choose which is the true symbol of the nation, it has to be the people, not the flag which are but pieces of cloth.